LLMs Are Expensive: Here’s How to Reduce Token Usage

The rise of large language models (LLMs) like GPT‑4, Claude, and Gemini has changed the way businesses build software. From automating customer support to powering research assistants, LLMs offer speed, creativity, and insight at scale.

But there’s one major problem: LLMs are expensive.
And the biggest cost driver? Tokens.

Every prompt you send and every word generated is made up of tokens. The longer the prompt and response, the more tokens you use and the more you pay. For companies building AI-powered products or features, this can quickly add up to tens of thousands in cloud spend each month.

In this blog, we’ll explore why token usage is the hidden cost behind LLM development, and how you can reduce token usage without sacrificing output quality. If you’re looking to scale AI without breaking your budget, this guide is for you.

What Are Tokens and Why Do They Matter?

Tokens are the building blocks of LLMs. A token is usually 3–4 characters long or about 0.75 words on average. LLM providers like OpenAI and Anthropic charge based on the number of tokens you send (input) and receive (output).

Let’s say you’re using GPT‑4 to summarise customer emails. A single request might use:

• 150 tokens of prompt (input)
• 300 tokens of reply (output)

That’s 450 tokens per request. Now scale that up:

• 10,000 requests/day = 4.5 million tokens/day
• 135 million tokens/month
• At GPT‑4 pricing, that’s thousands of dollars just for one use case

And that’s before you add retries, testing, or growing user traffic.

Quick link: The Hidden Cloud Costs of Building with OpenAI & Anthropic

Where Teams Waste Tokens (and Money)

Most AI teams aren’t intentionally wasteful, but without proper monitoring, token bloat is easy to miss. Here’s where it usually happens:

1. Long or verbose prompts

Many prompts are written with extra instructions, repetitions, or overly detailed context. These may seem helpful, but often add unnecessary tokens without improving output.

2. Over-generous output lengths

If your AI assistant always returns a long reply even when short answers would do, you’re paying for tokens no one needs.

3. Using the wrong model

You might be using GPT‑4 or Claude for tasks that simpler (and cheaper) models like GPT‑3.5 can handle just as well.

4. Prompt retries during testing

During development, teams often re-run prompts to test output. Each retry burns tokens, and when not tracked, it leads to silent cost inflation.

5. Repeating context in every request

Some apps re-send full conversation history or product documentation every time. This increases input tokens needlessly.

How to Reduce Token Usage Without Sacrificing Quality

Reducing token usage doesn’t mean compromising on performance. The key is to write efficient prompts, use the right models, and monitor your usage in real time. Here’s how:

1. Audit and trim your prompts

Go through your most common prompts and identify:

• Repeated phrases
• Unnecessary instructions
• Long-winded formatting

Often, you can shorten prompts by 30–50% without losing quality.

Before:
“Can you please kindly rewrite the following email in a more formal tone, using proper grammar, clear structure, and professional language?”

After:
“Rewrite this email in a formal, professional tone.”

Same outcome, half the tokens.

2. Use dynamic prompt templates

Instead of hardcoding long prompts, build templates with only essential variables. This makes it easier to optimise and reduce token length as you scale.

3. Set output token limits

Use the max_tokens parameter to limit how long replies can be. This is especially useful for summarisation, code suggestions, or product descriptions.

4. Choose the right model for the task

Not all tasks need the power of GPT‑4 or Claude. Use GPT‑3.5 or Gemini 1.5 for simpler jobs like tagging, translation, or short answers.

Smart model routing can reduce costs by up to 70% in some cases.

5. Store reusable context

Instead of resending the full context (e.g. user history, docs), store embeddings or use memory APIs to reduce input token count while keeping context rich.

Why You Need to Monitor Token Usage Continuously

Reducing token usage isn’t a one-time fix. Prompts evolve. Teams grow. Features change. That’s why you need ongoing visibility into how tokens are being used and where you can save more.

Without monitoring, you’re flying blind.

• Which team is spending the most?
• Which prompt is the most expensive?
• Which model is overused?

Without answers to these, optimisation becomes guesswork.

Quick link: AI Usage Monitoring Software

WrangleAI: Reduce Token Usage With Visibility and Control

WrangleAI gives you the tools to track, reduce, and optimise token usage across your teams, models, and apps.

It works with OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, and other LLM providers to show you exactly where your tokens and your budget are going.

With WrangleAI, you get:

• Token-level tracking across all your models
• Prompt audits to flag bloated or redundant instructions
• Smart model routing to assign the right task to the right model
• Spend caps to prevent surprise bills
• Internal billing tools to see which team or product is responsible
• Usage dashboards to help you make data-backed decisions

Instead of building your own dashboards or reacting to cloud invoices, WrangleAI gives you control before the cost hits your budget.

Conclusion

LLMs are a powerful tool but they come with a price. If you’re not watching your token usage, you’re almost certainly wasting money. And over time, that waste can become unsustainable.

The good news is: you don’t have to sacrifice quality to reduce token usage.

By writing efficient prompts, using the right models, limiting output length, and monitoring usage in real time, you can cut costs while keeping your AI features sharp.

WrangleAI is here to help.
If you’re ready to stop guessing and start governing your AI costs, request a free demo at wrangleai.com.

FAQs